MINT PDO vs Silhouette Threads – PLLA and PDO Threads

Last Updated On: February 19, 2025

The material composition of thread lifts plays a crucial role in their effectiveness and longevity. Studies show that polydioxanone (PDO) and poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) threads offer distinct benefits—PDO threads stimulate collagen synthesis for skin tightening, while PLLA threads provide longer-lasting volume and structural support.

Two popular options in thread lifting are MINT PDO threads and Silhouette threads. While both aim to enhance facial contours and improve skin laxity, they differ in material, mechanism of action, and treatment outcomes.

In this article, we will compare MINT PDO vs. Silhouette threads, examining their composition, benefits, and ideal use cases to help patients and practitioners make informed choices.

Key Takeaways

• MINT PDO threads are made from Polydioxanone (PDO), while Silhouette threads consist of Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), influencing their effectiveness and longevity.
• MINT PDO threads provide an immediate mechanical lift by gripping and repositioning sagging skin, whereas Silhouette threads use bidirectional cones for a structured lift and promote long-term collagen production.
• MINT PDO threads yield visible results within 1 to 2 weeks and last up to 12 months, making them suitable for mild to moderate skin laxity. Silhouette threads improve gradually over 3 to 6 months and can last up to 24 months, ideal for moderate to severe sagging.
• MINT PDO threads are best for younger patients with mild sagging looking for subtle results, while Silhouette threads cater to individuals with moderate to severe sagging seeking longer-lasting results.
• Both treatments are generally safe with minor risks, including temporary swelling and bruising; skilled practitioners can minimize these complications.

About: Med Supply Solutions has been operating since 2016 and is known as one of the industry’s top and trusted suppliers of cosmetic and viscosupplementation products. Contact our sales department for more information about buying Silhouette threads online.  

Material Composition

The primary distinction between these two thread types lies in their material composition:

• MINT PDO Threads: Made of Polydioxanone (PDO), a biodegradable polymer used in surgical sutures for decades.
• Silhouette Threads: Made of Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), a biocompatible material that stimulates long-term collagen production while gradually dissolving.

These materials influence how the threads interact with the skin and the longevity of their effects.

Mechanisms of Action 

MINT PDO and Silhouette Threads provide an immediate lift while stimulating collagen production, but their mechanisms differ. MINT PDO Threads use barbed sutures to grip and reposition sagging skin, offering an instant mechanical lift. They also stimulate fibroblast activity, promoting collagen formation. These threads dissolve within 6 to 9 months, leaving behind a supportive collagen network that helps maintain skin firmness.

Silhouette Threads, on the other hand, feature bidirectional cones that anchor and lift the skin for a more structured lift. Made from PLLA, these threads enhance long-term collagen production, prolonging the effects beyond the dissolution period. Their dual-action mechanism provides immediate lift and progressive skin regeneration, making them a preferred choice for moderate to severe skin laxity.

Expected Results with MINT PDO vs. Silhouette Threads

Both treatments enhance skin firmness and contouring but differ in longevity and intensity. MINT PDO Threads provide an immediate lift, with visible results appearing within 1 to 2 weeks. Their collagen-stimulating effects last 6 to 12 months, making them ideal for mild to moderate skin laxity.

Silhouette Threads, however, gradually improve over 3 to 6 months as collagen production increases. Their results last 12 to 24 months, delivering a longer-lasting lift. Due to their more potent anchoring mechanism, Silhouette Threads are more effective for moderate to severe skin laxity, making them a preferred choice for deeper facial sagging.

Patient Suitability

Selecting the most suitable thread lift treatment depends on individual skin concerns, the degree of aging, and the desired results. While both MINT PDO and Silhouette threads offer non-surgical skin tightening, they cater to different patient needs based on their lifting capabilities and longevity. Understanding the differences can help patients make an informed decision.

Ideal Candidates for MINT PDO Threads

MINT PDO threads are best for individuals seeking a subtle yet effective skin lift with minimal recovery time. This option is ideal for:

• Younger patients (30s–50s) experience mild to moderate skin sagging.
• Those looking for a temporary lift with a natural, refreshed appearance.
• Patients new to thread lifting who want to test its effects before committing to a longer-lasting solution.

Ideal Candidates for Silhouette Threads

Silhouette threads provide a more significant lifting effect, making them suitable for individuals with advanced signs of aging. These threads are best for:

• Patients with moderate to severe skin sagging, including visible jowls and deep folds.
• Those looking for longer-lasting results with enhanced collagen production.
• Individuals seeking a non-surgical alternative to a traditional facelift with noticeable tightening and contouring effects.

By assessing skin laxity, facial structure, and treatment expectations, patients can choose the thread lift option that best aligns with their aesthetic goals. Consulting with a qualified practitioner ensures the right approach for optimal results.

Durability

The duration of thread lift results depends on the type of threads used, their material composition, and how the body absorbs them over time. While both MINT PDO and Silhouette threads offer noticeable lifting and skin-tightening effects, they differ in their longevity and collagen-stimulating benefits.

MINT PDO Threads

• Fully dissolve within 6 to 9 months, but the collagen production they stimulate can maintain results for up to 12 months.
• Best suited for patients seeking a temporary enhancement with natural-looking skin tightening.

Silhouette Threads

• Designed to resorb gradually over 12 to 18 months, with skin-lifting effects lasting up to 24 months due to prolonged collagen stimulation.
• Ideal for individuals looking for a longer-lasting lift and more significant facial contouring.

By understanding the differences in resorption timelines and collagen effects, patients can choose the most appropriate thread lift option based on their aesthetic goals and desired treatment longevity.

Procedural Differences Between MINT PDO and Silhouette Threads

Both procedures are minimally invasive but differ in their insertion techniques and anesthesia requirements. MINT PDO Threads are inserted using a fine cannula under local anesthesia. The procedure typically takes 30 to 45 minutes and involves minimal downtime, making it a convenient option for those seeking a quick and effective lift.

Silhouette Threads, on the other hand, require small incisions to properly anchor the threads, making the procedure slightly more complex. It lasts 45 to 60 minutes and may cause mild swelling for a few days. Despite these differences, both treatments offer a relatively short recovery period, allowing patients to resume normal activities within a week.

Side Effects and Safety

While both thread types are considered safe, patients may experience some temporary side effects:

• MINT PDO Threads:
  • Mild swelling, bruising, or tenderness at injection sites.
  • Rare risks include thread migration or asymmetry.
• Silhouette Threads:
  • Temporary puckering or dimpling due to anchoring cones.
  • In rare cases, threads may require removal (can silhouette threads be removed).

A skilled practitioner minimizes risks by using proper placement techniques and patient selection.

Patient Satisfaction Rates

Studies and patient testimonials indicate high satisfaction rates for both treatments, though results depend on expectations and aging severity. MINT PDO Threads provide quick results with minimal downtime, making them ideal for those seeking a subtle lift. The high patient satisfaction rates for this treatment range validate how it provides an immediate firming effect and several months of collagen stimulation.

Silhouette Lift Threads are favored for their longer-lasting effects and ability to enhance collagen production over time. Satisfaction rates are high among patients with moderate to severe skin laxity. Many prefer this option for its dual-action benefit of immediate lifting and gradual skin regeneration, resulting in a more natural and extended rejuvenation.

Conclusion

MINT PDO and Silhouette Threads offer non-surgical lifting and rejuvenation, but their differences determine suitability for each patient. MINT PDO Threads are ideal for mild skin sagging with quicker recovery, while Silhouette Threads provide longer-lasting lift with greater collagen stimulation. Consulting a qualified practitioner ensures the best choice based on individual skin needs and treatment goals.

FAQs

1. How long do MINT PDO and Silhouette Threads last?

MINT PDO Threads last 6 to 12 months, while Silhouette Threads provide results for 12 to 24 months due to extended collagen stimulation.

2. Which thread lift is better for deep wrinkles?

Silhouette Threads are better suited for deep wrinkles and moderate to severe skin sagging. They offer a more substantial lift and longer-lasting collagen production.

3. What is the recovery time for MINT PDO vs. Silhouette Threads?

MINT PDO has a faster recovery (3–5 days) than Silhouette Threads (7–10 days) due to the anchoring technique used in Silhouette treatments.

4. Can thread lifts be combined with other treatments?

Yes, thread lifts can be combined with dermal fillers, Botox, or skin resurfacing for enhanced rejuvenation and longer-lasting results.

References

Unal M, İslamoğlu GK, Unal GÜ, Köylü N. Experiences of barbed polydioxanone (PDO) cog thread for facial rejuvenation and our technique to prevent thread migration. Journal of Dermatological Treatment. 2019;32(2):227-230. doi:10.1080/09546634.2019.1640347

Samizadeh S, Samizadeh S. Thread types and materials. In: Springer eBooks. ; 2024:179-198. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-47954-0_8

Hong GW, Kim SB, Park SY, Wan J, Yi KH. Thread lifting Materials: A review of its difference in terms of technical and mechanical perspective. Clinical Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology. 2024;Volume 17:999-1006. doi:10.2147/ccid.s457352