Sunekos vs Rejuran – Which Skinbooster is Best?

Last Updated On: November 6, 2024

Skin experts agree that collagen is essential for maintaining skin elasticity, hydration, and a youthful glow. However, collagen production naturally declines with age, leading to common signs of aging like wrinkles and sagging skin. This highlights the value of treatments that can stimulate collagen production to help rejuvenate and revitalize aging skin.

Two popular skin boosters, Sunekos and Rejuran, are known for their collagen-stimulating properties. While both are designed to rejuvenate the skin, they use different methods and ingredients to achieve results. Understanding these distinctions is key to choosing the right treatment.

This article will explore the essential differences between Sunekos and Rejuran, helping you decide which skin booster might best suit your needs.

Key Takeaways

• Sunekos and Rejuran are injectable skin boosters designed to enhance skin health by stimulating collagen production, improving hydration, and supporting rejuvenation.
• Sunekos enhances skin elasticity and surface hydration through a blend of amino acids and hyaluronic acid, making it particularly effective for areas like the under-eyes.
• Rejuran uses salmon DNA to target deeper skin layers, promoting tissue repair and overall skin health from within, which is ideal for those seeking significant tissue renewal.
• Choosing between these treatments depends on your specific skin goals: Sunekos is ideal for hydration and surface-level rejuvenation, while Rejuran is preferred for deep tissue repair.

About: Operating since 2016, Med Supply Solutions is known for being one of the industry’s top and trusted suppliers of cosmetic and viscosupplementation products. If you’re looking to buy Sunekos online, contact our sales department for more information.

Introduction to Sunekos and Rejuran

Skin boosters are advanced injectable treatments designed to hydrate, revitalize, and enhance the skin’s appearance. By targeting specific skin needs, they improve texture, elasticity, and overall hydration. Among the most popular skin boosters are Sunekos and Rejuran, each offering unique benefits for rejuvenating the skin.

Sunekos promotes elasticity and hydration by targeting the extracellular matrix, helping to rebuild skin structure and reduce fine lines. In contrast, Rejuran focuses on deep tissue repair, stimulating regeneration for a youthful, firmer appearance.

Formulation and Mechanism of Action

Sunekos and Rejuran are powerful skin boosters with unique ingredients that rejuvenate the skin in distinct ways, each with a specific recommended treatment schedule:

• Sunekos: Formulated with a blend of amino acids and hyaluronic acid, Sunekos enhances skin elasticity and hydration by targeting the extracellular matrix. This approach promotes skin bioregeneration and firmness, resulting in noticeable improvements in tone and smoothness. Typically, how many Sunekos treatments are needed will depend on individual skin needs, but most patients undergo an initial course of four treatments spaced about a week apart.
• Rejuran: Using salmon DNA, Rejuran focuses on repairing deep skin layers, stimulating tissue regeneration, and enhancing overall skin health. This treatment is especially effective for restoring damaged tissue beneath the surface, making it ideal for long-term repair. Rejuran usually requires an initial series of three to four treatments spaced two to four weeks apart.

Treatment Outcomes and Effectiveness

Sunekos and Rejuran have shown promising results for skin rejuvenation. Patients report smoother, more youthful skin after treatments.

Sunekos Treatment Outcomes

People see good results with Sunekos for skin rejuvenation. It helps the skin by making it more elastic and hydrated. 

Image courtesy of Ekol Hospitals / Dentekol NI

The patient received Sunekos 1200 treatment for the lower face, which rejuvenated the skin by stimulating collagen and elastin production. Results included improved skin tone and reduced fine lines without altering appearance.

This treatment improves surface-level hydration and firmness. Many users notice their skin looks better after just a few treatments, and Sunekos injection points are very effective in targeted areas.

Rejuran Treatment Outcomes

People who get Rejuran notice their skin feels deeply repaired. This treatment goes deep to fix tissues.

Image courtesy of Toledomed Davao

This patient underwent a single session of Infini Plus Rejuran for acne scars. Four weeks post-treatment, significant improvement in skin texture and scar appearance was observed, enhancing overall skin quality.

Because of this, many choose Rejuran for lasting beauty results. Unlike Sunekos, which hydrates the top layer, Rejuran goes deeper for longer-lasting rejuvenation.

Strengths and Weaknesses

Sunekos is particularly effective at enhancing skin hydration and elasticity by targeting the extracellular matrix, which promotes visible rejuvenation and firmness. This makes it ideal for various facial areas, including the delicate under-eye region, where many users report positive results after just a few sessions.

Sunekos’ versatility is a strong advantage, but it has its limitations. It may be less effective for deep tissue repair, making it less suited for those seeking more intense rejuvenation, which Rejuran addresses.

Some users experience mild swelling post-treatment, especially in sensitive areas under the eyes. This can require combining Sunekos with other treatments for more pronounced results, potentially adding to the overall treatment cost and time.

Meanwhile, Rejuran excels in in-depth tissue repair, supporting the body’s natural healing processes for significant rejuvenation and repair beneath the skin’s surface. Unlike Sunekos, which focuses on external hydration, Rejuran addresses the root causes of aging by enhancing skin elasticity and internal hydration, making it an ideal option for substantial tissue repair.

Despite these benefits, Rejuran may not provide the same collagen and elastin stimulation as treatments like Profhilo, which could be a drawback for those primarily seeking to boost skin firmness. Additionally, while it effectively targets deep tissue regeneration, Rejuran may lack the immediate hydration benefits that some users desire. 

Patients who may have had mixed experiences with other boosters, like Sunekos, might find Rejuran appealing for its unique focus on deep repair. However, they should also consider its limitations regarding surface-level hydration.

Conclusion

Choosing between Sunekos and Rejuran depends on your skin’s unique needs. Sunekos is ideal if you’re looking to boost hydration and surface-level firmness, while Rejuran excels at deep tissue repair. Both treatments work to promote a youthful, healthy appearance, so consider your primary skin concerns and select the option that best meets those goals for optimal results.

FAQs

1. What is the primary difference between Sunekos and Rejuran?

Sunekos focuses on improving hydration and elasticity by targeting the extracellular matrix, making it ideal for surface-level enhancements. Rejuran, on the other hand, uses salmon DNA to promote deep tissue repair and cellular regeneration.

2. Are there side effects with Sunekos or Rejuran treatments?

Both treatments are generally well-tolerated. Some users may experience mild swelling or redness post-treatment, especially with Sunekos in delicate areas like under the eyes. Rejuran may cause minor bruising or discomfort at the injection site.

3. How many Sunekos treatments are needed for optimal results?

Most patients benefit from an initial course of four Sunekos treatments spaced a week apart. Maintenance sessions every 6–9 months help to sustain the results.

References

Reilly DM, Lozano J. Skin collagen through the lifestages: importance for skin health and beauty. Plastic and Aesthetic Research. 2021;8(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.153 

Ypiranga S, Fonseca R. Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Skin Booster on the Face. Clinical Approaches and Procedures in Cosmetic Dermatology. Published online 2017:1-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20253-2_23-1